Petitioner alleged that the Delaware Department of Transportation (“DelDOT”) violated FOIA by denying access to certain records related to a property acquisition.
DECIDED: As these records were exempt pursuant to the potential litigation exemption, no violation of FOIA was found.
Read MorePetitioner alleged that the Town of Blades violated FOIA by failing to give proper notice to the public that a first reading of a resolution to raise taxes was planned for the October 27, 2025 Town Council meeting.
DECIDED: The Town did not violate FOIA by failing to convey in its agenda that a “first reading” of this resolution was planned for this meeting.
Read MorePetitioner alleged that the City of Dover improperly denied access to the requested communications pursuant to the potential litigation exemption.
DECIDED: As the City did not meet its burden of demonstrating the requested records were exempt under FOIA, it was determined that the City violated FOIA in denying access to the requested records.
Read MorePetitioner made multiple allegations regarding FOIA requests submitted to the Town of Greenwood.
DECIDED: As FOIA only guarantees access to public records to citizens of the State, the Town did not violate FOIA in responding to these requests.
Read MorePetitioner alleged that the Town of Greenwood violated FOIA by : (1) failing to timely respond to several FOIA requests; (2) providing inaccurate responses and noting some were incomplete; (3) failing to redact the personal information of the requesting parties from the Town’s FOIA log when it produced the log to a separate requesting party; and (4) failing to properly train its FOIA coordinator.
DECIDED: The Town violated FOIA by failing to meet its burden regarding the completeness of its responses to two requests. The remainder of the claims do not constitute violations of FOIA.
Read MorePetitioner alleged that the Christina School District Board of Education violated FOIA by conducting multiple, closed strategy sessions where public business was discussed without following FOIA’s open meeting requirements.
DECIDED: The Board did not violate FOIA’s open meeting requirements by meeting privately or through a constructive quorum on the occasions alleged in the Petition.
Read More
Petitioner alleged that the Delaware Office of Management and Budget improperly denied the FOIA request due to lack of state citizenship, because a state citizenship requirement is unconstitutional.
DECIDED: No violation of FOIA was found.
Read MorePetitioner alleged that the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (“DNREC”) improperly responded to the FOIA request, because Section 10002(o)(16) only shields emails sent by members of the General Assembly, not emails sent to members, and the request merely sought emails that were sent to the General Assembly from DNREC.
DECIDED: As any emails received by the General Assembly members or their staff are exempt, no violation was found in this regard.
Read MorePetitioner alleged that the Village of Arden violated FOIA by failing to post a proper meeting notice for the September 22, 2025 meeting with the time and location. The petitioner also alleged that the mailed notice was improper.
DECIDED: The Village violated FOIA by failing to post a sufficient notice for the meeting initially scheduled for September 22, 2025, but rescheduled for September 29, 2025. The second claim was not an allegation of a FOIA violation and was outside the scope of the determination.
Read MorePetitioner alleged that the Delaware State Police, Department of Safety and Homeland Security’s (“DSP”) denial of your request was overly broad.
DECIDED: As the requested logs and call summaries were part of the investigatory files, DSP did not violate FOIA by denying access to these records.
Read More