25-IB47 9/29/25 FOIA Opinion Letter to Michael Ryan re: Delaware State Police, Department of Safety and Homeland Security
Petitioner alleged that the Delaware State Police, Department of Safety and Homeland Security refused to provide a copy of the police report documenting the petitioner’s verbal complaint.
DECIDED: As this report is exempt as an investigatory file record under Section 10002(o)(3), no violation of FOIA was found.
Read More25-IB46 9/29/25 FOIA Opinion Letter to Julie Morris re: City of Milford
Petitioner alleged that the City violated FOIA by improperly shifting responsibility to the petitioner by recommending a change to email providers when the petitioner did not receive confirmations of requests. The petition alleges that request 2025-38 was declared closed without a complete response, as the City sent partial vendor totals without providing the full, underlying financial disclosure records requested and that the cost estimate of $9,592.00 for request 2025-60 was excessive and unreasonable.
DECIDED: The City violated FOIA by failing to demonstrate its cost estimate was compliant with FOIA’s fee provisions. However, no violation with respect to the remaining claims was found.
Read More
25-IB45 9/09/25 FOIA Opinion Letter to Irina Genseruk re: New Castle County
Petitioner alleged New Castle County violated FOIA in the following ways: (1) the County’s response did not cite specific statutory exemptions for the denial of documents; (2) the response did not provide a log or index of withheld records, (3) the response was formulaic and non-individualized; (4) the response referenced only publicly available websites and avoidi questions related to decision-making and enforcement actions; (5) no clarification was provided regarding the grandfathered use status of the parcel; and (6) the County’s initial denial of your request based on your citizenship violated FOIA. The petition also made non-FOIA claims related to misconduct and other issues.
DECIDED: As the County’s response did not violate FOIA as alleged above and FOIA does not require a public body to provide an index of withheld records or to answer questions, no violation of FOIA was found. The remaining claims were not appropriate for consideration.
Read More25-IB44 9/03/25 FOIA Opinion Letter to Phillip Hudson re: Christina School District
Petitioner alleged that the Christina School District violated FOIA’s public records provisions by: (1) requiring in-person verification of the petitioner’s identity with two forms of identification in order to receive the responsive personnel records; (2) refusing to transmit responsive records by email or mail; and (3) missing the extended response deadline for the request.
DECIDED: The District did not sufficiently support that two items in the request were exempt and not required to be made available through its FOIA request process. A supplemental response specific to those two items was recommended. The remaining claims were determined to be inappropriate for consideration.
Read More
